Procedural Justice-Informed Alternatives to Contempt (2020-2024)

The Procedural Justice-Informed Alternatives to Contempt (PJAC) project sought to increase parents’ compliance with child support orders by using procedural justice principles to increase trust and confidence in their processes and to reduce the use of contempt for noncompliant parents. The federal Office of Child Support Enforcement funded six local child support agencies to implement a demonstration of these strategies. The evaluation of PJAC used a random assignment design and included implementation and benefit cost studies. As a subcontractor to MDRC, MEF led evaluation operations and implementation research in two sites, authored project briefs, and led the cost-benefit analysis. MEF also led a follow-up qualitative study of how child support programs responded to the COVID-19 pandemic and implications of these changes for longer term changes to the operations and policies of the child support program.

PUBLICATIONS:
Working Toward A Resolution: Facilitating Dialogue Between Parents Using Principles of Procedural Justice
Comparing the Costs and Benefits of Two Approaches to Addressing Nonpayment of Child Support
Child Support Amidst the Pandemic: Changes to Service Delivery at Three Sites in the Procedural Justice-Informed Alternatives to Contempt Demonstration
The Child Support Program’s Response to the Pandemic and Economic Assistance: A Look at Three Sites in the Procedural Justice-Informed Alternatives to Contempt Demonstration
POLICY AREAS:
Child Support | Fatherhood and Family Strengthening Programs
METHODOLOGIES:
Cost and Benefit-cost Studies | Evaluation Planning and Technical Assistance | Implementation and Process Studies | Interviews and Focus Groups | Planning and Facilitating Convenings | Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) | Research Design
STAFF:
Mary Farrell | Asaph Glosser | Sam Elkin | Bright Sarfo | Semhar Gebrekristos | Sofia Torres | Becca Heilman | Sophie Hearn | Neda Delavarpour